Raiders Sign Hunter Renfrow To Two-Year Extension
The Las Vegas Raiders signed Pro Bowl wide receiver Hunter ...
Hunter Renfrow
Overall rank
WR10
2021
- Height
- 5' 10"
- Weight
- 184 lbs
- Arm Length
- 29 1/8" (3rd)
- Draft Pick
- 5.11 2019
- College
- Clemson
- Age
- 26.5
Workout Metrics
4.59
33rd
79.5
11th
117.5
31st
10.99
77th
9.89
24th
40-Yard Dash
Speed Score
Burst Score
Agility Score
Catch Radius
Share This
-
Download Image
-
- Share to or
Hunter Renfrow Bio & Season Stats
| Year Year | Games Played Games | Targets Tgts | Receptions Rec | Receiving Yards Rec Yds | Yards Per Reception YPR | Air Yards Air Yds | Receiving TDs Rec TD | Fantasy Points Per Game Fantasy Pts/Game |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 17 | 128 | 103 | 1038 | 10.1 | 851 | 9 | 15.2 (#16) |
| 2020 | 16 | 77 | 56 | 656 | 11.7 | 552 | 2 | 8.2 (#70) |
| 2019 | 13 | 71 | 49 | 605 | 12.3 | 485 | 4 | 10.3 (#51) |
-
College Dominator23.7% (32nd)
-
College YPR10.4 (5th)
-
College Target Share16.6% (35th)
-
Breakout Age21.7 (21st)
Hunter Renfrow Advanced Stats & Metrics
Opportunity
| Targets | Target Share | Target Rate | Snap Share | Slot Snaps | Routes Run | Route Participation Route % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 128 (7.5 p/g) | 21.7% (30.8% rz) | 25.7% | 66.1% | 460 (64.1% rate) | 499 (29.4 p/g) | 79.5% |
| #17 | #27 | #27 | #73 | #9 | #20 | #54 |
Opportunity
| Air Yards | Air Yards Share | Average Target Distance (ADOT) Target Depth (ADOT) | Deep Targets | Red Zone Targets Red Zone Tgts | Target Quality Rating | Hog Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 851 (50.1 p/g) | 18.0% | 6.6 | 7 (0.4 p/g) | 24 (18 rec) | 5.83 | 17.8% |
| #46 | #70 | #86 | #76 | #6 | #31 | #9 |
Productivity
| Receptions Recs | Receiving Yards Rec Yards | Yards After Catch YAC | Unrealized Air Yards | Total TDs | Fantasy Points Per Game Fantasy Pts/Game | Expected Fantasy Points Per Game Expected Fantasy Pts/Game |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 103 (6.1 p/g) | 1038 (61.1 p/g) | 447 (3.5 p/tgt) | 260 (2.0 p/tgt) | 9 (8.5% rate) | 15.2 | 14.1 (+1.12 diff) |
| #8 | #19 | #9 | #80 | #10 | #16 | #18 |
Efficiency
| Target Accuracy | Yards Per Route Run | Yards Per Target YPT | Yards Per Reception YPR | Catchable Target Rate | Catch Rate | True Catch Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.3 | 2.08 | 8.1 | 10.1 | 87.5% (112 tgts) | 80.5% | 92.0% |
| #1 | #22 | #46 | #85 | #2 | #2 | #20 |
Efficiency
| Target Separation | Average Cushion | Target Premium | Dominator Rating | Juke Rate | Drops | Contested Catch Rate Contested Catch % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.14 | 4.02 | +17.2% | 31.4% | 11.7% | 4 (3.1%) | 26.9% (26 tgts) |
| #5 | #90 | #12 | #7 | #30 | #48 | #68 |
Efficiency
| Production Premium | Expected Points Added (EPA) EPA | QB Rating Per Target QB Rating Per Target | Best Ball Points Added Best Ball Pts Added | Fantasy Points Per Route Run Fantasy Points Per Route | Fantasy Points Per Target Fantasy Points Per Target | Total Fantasy Points Total Fantasy Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +10.5 | +73.8 | 123.9 | 111.4 (6.6 p/g) | 0.52 | 2.02 | 259.10 |
| #11 | #9 | #10 | #14 | #12 | #14 | #10 |
Zone vs Man
| Total Route Wins | Route Win Rate | Routes vs Man | Win Rate vs Man | Target Rate vs Man | Target Separation vs Man Tgt Separation vs Man | Fantasy Points Per Target vs Man Fantasy Pts/Tgt vs Man |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 203 | 41.2% | 235 (255 zone) | 38.3% (41.6% zone) | 24.7% (25.5% zone) | 2.11 (2.64 zone) | 2.07 (2.03 zone) |
| #21 | #37 | #29 | #27 | #34 | #9 | #25 |
Opportunity
| Targets | Target Share | Target Rate | Snap Share | Slot Snaps | Routes Run | Route Participation Route % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77 (4.8 p/g) | 15.2% (11.6% rz) | 21.5% | 49.7% | 334 (65.1% rate) | 358 (22.4 p/g) | 65.0% |
| #56 | #67 | #45 | #100 | #20 | #66 | - |
Opportunity
| Air Yards | Air Yards Share | Average Target Distance (ADOT) Target Depth (ADOT) | Deep Targets | Red Zone Targets Red Zone Tgts | Target Quality Rating | Hog Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 552 (34.5 p/g) | 12.4% | 7.2 | 9 (0.6 p/g) | 8 (5 rec) | 5.00 | 15.0% |
| #79 | #97 | #98 | #68 | #60 | #81 | #29 |
Productivity
| Receptions Recs | Receiving Yards Rec Yards | Yards After Catch YAC | Unrealized Air Yards | Total TDs | Fantasy Points Per Game Fantasy Pts/Game | Expected Fantasy Points Per Game Expected Fantasy Pts/Game |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56 (3.5 p/g) | 656 (41.0 p/g) | 339 (4.4 p/tgt) | 235 (3.1 p/tgt) | 2 (3.6% rate) | 8.2 | 8.1 (+0.27 diff) |
| #44 | #52 | #20 | #87 | #81 | #70 | #70 |
Efficiency
| Target Accuracy | Yards Per Route Run | Yards Per Target YPT | Yards Per Reception YPR | Catchable Target Rate | Catch Rate | True Catch Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 231.0 | 1.83 | 8.5 | 11.7 | 77.9% (60 tgts) | 72.7% | 93.3% |
| #51 | #41 | #46 | #74 | #47 | #24 | #9 |
Efficiency
| Target Separation | Average Cushion | Target Premium | Dominator Rating | Juke Rate | Drops | Contested Catch Rate Contested Catch % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.69 | 4.04 | -17.1% | 11.4% | - | 2 (2.6%) | 30.0% (10 tgts) |
| #47 | #23 | #163 | #93 | - | #81 | #86 |
Efficiency
| Production Premium | Expected Points Added (EPA) EPA | QB Rating Per Target QB Rating Per Target | Best Ball Points Added Best Ball Pts Added | Fantasy Points Per Route Run Fantasy Points Per Route | Fantasy Points Per Target Fantasy Points Per Target | Total Fantasy Points Total Fantasy Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +4.6 | +26.3 | 106.8 | 20.4 (1.3 p/g) | 0.37 | 1.71 | 131.60 |
| #49 | #58 | #34 | #82 | #57 | #70 | #59 |
Zone vs Man
| Total Route Wins | Route Win Rate | Routes vs Man | Win Rate vs Man | Target Rate vs Man | Target Separation vs Man Tgt Separation vs Man | Fantasy Points Per Target vs Man Fantasy Pts/Tgt vs Man |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Opportunity
| Targets | Target Share | Target Rate | Snap Share | Slot Snaps | Routes Run | Route Participation Route % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71 (5.5 p/g) | 17.6% (22.2% rz) | 28.1% | 54.2% | 282 (66.8% rate) | 253 (19.5 p/g) | 59.8% |
| #59 | #55 | #13 | #110 | #24 | #77 | #83 |
Opportunity
| Air Yards | Air Yards Share | Average Target Distance (ADOT) Target Depth (ADOT) | Deep Targets | Red Zone Targets Red Zone Tgts | Target Quality Rating | Hog Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 485 (37.3 p/g) | 17.5% | 6.8 | 7 (0.5 p/g) | 12 (9 rec) | 5.31 | 16.8% |
| #85 | #75 | #102 | #90 | #31 | #71 | #8 |
Productivity
| Receptions Recs | Receiving Yards Rec Yards | Yards After Catch YAC | Unrealized Air Yards | Total TDs | Fantasy Points Per Game Fantasy Pts/Game | Expected Fantasy Points Per Game Expected Fantasy Pts/Game |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49 (3.8 p/g) | 605 (46.5 p/g) | 305 (4.3 p/tgt) | 185 (2.6 p/tgt) | 4 (8.2% rate) | 10.3 | - |
| #47 | #54 | #23 | #112 | #52 | #51 | - |
Efficiency
| Target Accuracy | Yards Per Route Run | Yards Per Target YPT | Yards Per Reception YPR | Catchable Target Rate | Catch Rate | True Catch Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.4 | 2.39 | 8.5 | 12.3 | 84.5% (60 tgts) | 69.0% | 81.7% |
| #20 | #18 | #41 | #62 | #7 | #16 | #50 |
Efficiency
| Target Separation | Average Cushion | Target Premium | Dominator Rating | Juke Rate | Drops | Contested Catch Rate Contested Catch % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.54 | 4.52 | +11.9% | 20.1% | - | 5 (7.0%) | 30.0% (10 tgts) |
| #45 | #19 | #31 | #54 | - | #32 | #70 |
Efficiency
| Production Premium | Expected Points Added (EPA) EPA | QB Rating Per Target QB Rating Per Target | Best Ball Points Added Best Ball Pts Added | Fantasy Points Per Route Run Fantasy Points Per Route | Fantasy Points Per Target Fantasy Points Per Target | Total Fantasy Points Total Fantasy Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +7.6 | +44.8 | 108.0 | 48.2 (3.7 p/g) | 0.53 | 1.88 | 133.50 |
| #32 | #35 | #24 | #51 | #17 | #34 | #53 |
Zone vs Man
| Total Route Wins | Route Win Rate | Routes vs Man | Win Rate vs Man | Target Rate vs Man | Target Separation vs Man Tgt Separation vs Man | Fantasy Points Per Target vs Man Fantasy Pts/Tgt vs Man |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Week Wk | Opponent Opp | Primary Corner Primary Corner | Snap Share Snap Share | Routes Routes | Targets Targets | Receptions Receptions | Receiving Yards Receiving Yards | Fantasy Points Fantasy Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BAL | Marlon Humphrey | 55.0% | 35 | 9 (2 rz) | 6 | 70 (68 air) | 13.0 (#41) |
| 2 | PIT | Tre Norwood | 43.8% | 24 | 7 | 5 | 57 (54 air) | 10.7 (#47) |
| 3 | MIA | Nik Needham | 52.5% | 28 | 6 (1 rz) | 5 (1 tds) | 77 (55 air) | 18.7 (#15) |
| 4 | LAC | Tevaughn Campbell | 66.1% | 31 | 8 (1 rz) | 6 (1 tds) | 45 (43 air) | 16.5 (#23) |
| 5 | CHI | Duke Shelley | 73.8% | 28 | 8 (1 rz) | 6 | 56 (54 air) | 11.6 (#35) |
| 6 | DEN | Patrick Surtain | 61.5% | 22 | 5 | 3 | 36 (36 air) | 6.6 (#62) |
| 7 | PHI | Avonte Maddox | 54.7% | 22 | 8 (2 rz) | 7 | 58 (34 air) | 12.8 (#27) |
| 9 | NYG | Darnay Holmes | 65.7% | 33 | 9 (3 rz) | 7 (1 tds) | 49 (21 air) | 17.9 (#11) |
| 10 | KC | L'Jarius Sneed | 74.5% | 31 | 9 (2 rz) | 7 (1 tds) | 46 (39 air) | 17.6 (#11) |
| 11 | CIN | Mike Hilton | 73.9% | 21 | 4 | 4 | 30 (13 air) | 7.5 (#51) |
| 12 | DAL | Jourdan Lewis | 69.3% | 29 | 9 | 8 | 134 (103 air) | 21.6 (#5) |
| 13 | WAS | Danny Johnson | 88.1% | 39 | 10 | 9 | 102 (74 air) | 19.2 (#13) |
| 14 | KC | Rashad Fenton | 93.4% | 44 | 14 (4 rz) | 13 (1 tds) | 117 (62 air) | 28.7 (#3) |
| 15 | CLE | M.J. Stewart | 78.5% | 33 | 5 (3 rz) | 3 | 32 (32 air) | 6.2 (#58) |
| 16 | DEN | Bryce Callahan | 58.2% | 21 | 3 (1 rz) | 3 (1 tds) | 40 (38 air) | 13.0 (#31) |
| 17 | IND | Kenny Moore | 64.6% | 29 | 9 (2 rz) | 7 (1 tds) | 76 (101 air) | 20.6 (#8) |
| 18 | LAC | Chris Harris | 62.2% | 29 | 5 (2 rz) | 4 (2 tds) | 13 (24 air) | 16.9 (#27) |
| 19 | CIN | Mike Hilton | 76.1% | 47 | 11 (1 rz) | 8 | 58 (71 air) | 13.8 (#12) |
| Week Wk | Opponent Opp | Primary Corner Primary Corner | Snap Share Snap Share | Routes Routes | Targets Targets | Receptions Receptions | Receiving Yards Receiving Yards | Fantasy Points Fantasy Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CAR | Corn Elder | 41.3% | 17 | 2 (1 rz) | 2 | 21 (6 air) | 4.1 (#84) |
| 2 | NO | Chauncey Gardner-Johnson | 48.7% | 20 | 3 | 3 | 37 (25 air) | 6.7 (#73) |
| 3 | NE | Jonathan Jones | 64.3% | 27 | 9 (2 rz) | 6 (1 tds) | 84 (112 air) | 20.4 (#16) |
| 4 | BUF | Taron Johnson | 66.7% | 38 | 8 (1 rz) | 5 | 57 (62 air) | 10.7 (#45) |
| 5 | KC | Tyrann Mathieu | 34.3% | 15 | 2 | 1 | 42 (25 air) | 5.2 (#70) |
| 7 | TB | Sean Murphy-Bunting | 54.8% | 24 | 6 | 4 | 42 (33 air) | 8.2 (#56) |
| 8 | CLE | Kevin Johnson | 19.7% | 9 | 4 (1 rz) | 4 (1 tds) | 26 (16 air) | 12.6 (#35) |
| 9 | LAC | Tevaughn Campbell | 56.0% | 16 | 3 | 2 | 60 (55 air) | 8.0 (#61) |
| 10 | DEN | Essang Bassey | 47.0% | 21 | 2 | 2 | 30 (7 air) | 5.0 (#66) |
| 11 | KC | Charvarius Ward | 33.3% | 14 | 2 | 2 | 37 (23 air) | 5.7 (#65) |
| 12 | ATL | Isaiah Oliver | 67.2% | 31 | 9 (1 rz) | 7 | 73 (38 air) | 14.3 (#28) |
| 13 | NYJ | Arthur Maulet | 63.0% | 32 | 6 | 4 | 47 (66 air) | 8.7 (#61) |
| 14 | IND | Kenny Moore | 58.2% | 30 | 7 (1 rz) | 5 | 38 (27 air) | 6.8 (#67) |
| 15 | LAC | Chris Harris | 17.6% | 6 | 2 | 1 | 4 (12 air) | 1.4 (#112) |
| 16 | MIA | - | 59.0% | 23 | 5 (1 rz) | 5 | 34 (4 air) | 8.4 (#54) |
| 17 | DEN | Will Parks | 74.2% | 35 | 7 | 3 | 24 (41 air) | 5.4 (#74) |
| Week Wk | Opponent Opp | Primary Corner Primary Corner | Snap Share Snap Share | Routes Routes | Targets Targets | Receptions Receptions | Receiving Yards Receiving Yards | Fantasy Points Fantasy Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DEN | Kareem Jackson | 29.6% | 8 | 3 (1 rz) | 2 | 13 | 3.3 (##90) |
| 2 | KC | Kendall Fuller | 75.4% | 20 | 8 (1 rz) | 4 | 30 | 7.0 (##65) |
| 3 | MIN | Mike Hughes | 59.3% | 21 | 4 | 3 | 28 | 5.8 (##70) |
| 4 | IND | Kenny Moore | 38.1% | 13 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 3.8 (##74) |
| 5 | CHI | Buster Skrine | 56.3% | 18 | 5 | 1 | 12 | 2.2 (##83) |
| 7 | GB | Tramon Williams | 46.8% | 16 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 3.4 (##80) |
| 8 | HOU | Justin Reid | 62.3% | 20 | 4 | 4 (1 tds) | 88 | 18.8 (##14) |
| 9 | DET | Justin Coleman | 50.7% | 20 | 7 (2 rz) | 6 (1 tds) | 54 | 17.4 (##14) |
| 10 | LAC | Desmond King | 59.6% | 21 | 5 (1 rz) | 4 | 42 | 8.2 (##42) |
| 11 | CIN | Darqueze Dennard | 47.6% | 18 | 6 (2 rz) | 5 | 66 | 11.6 (##30) |
| 12 | NYJ | Brian Poole | 44.6% | 16 | 5 | 3 | 31 | 6.1 (##53) |
| 16 | LAC | Desmond King | 50.8% | 23 | 9 (1 rz) | 7 (1 tds) | 107 | 23.7 (##6) |
| 17 | DEN | Isaac Yiadom | 80.9% | 39 | 9 (4 rz) | 6 (1 tds) | 102 | 22.2 (##8) |
Value Over Stream
(VOS)+3.6
(#54)
Value Over Stream: Valuation scheme calculates a player’s fantasy pts/game over the average waiver wire replacement in standard fantasy league formats during either the current season (or previous year during the offseason) and adjusts for positional bust rates. VOS rank in parenthesis spans all positions, enabling player comparisons across QB's, RB's, WR's, and TE's.
2021
Snap Share
2021
Target Share
2021
Fantasy Points
2021
Snap Share
2021
Target Share
2021
Fantasy Points
Hunter Renfrow ADP
79.90
79.90
Average Draft Position (2022)
(+2.44)
Powered By
7.08
Pick
WR40
Rank
Hunter Renfrow Media
Hunter Renfrow News & Analysis
Recent News
Hunter Renfrow Feeling Confident Under New Coach
Las Vegas Raiders wide receiver Hunter Renfrow believes he ...
Hunter Renfrow Expected To Have Big Role In 2022
Las Vegas Raiders wide receiver Hunter Renfrow isn't ...
Related Articles
2022 Las Vegas Raiders | Weapons Galore
Top 5 Biggest WR Surprises in 2021 - Can They Repeat?
2021 Fantasy Football Performance By Game Script
Matchup Monitor: Week 13
Targeting Games for Week 11 DFS Matchups
Popularity Index
Player Popularity Index (PPI) ranks PlayerProfiler page views over the last 30 days. For example, the No. 1 PPI player page is the most frequently visited page in recent weeks.
Hunter Renfrow Injury History
Severity:
Low
Medium
High
Games Missed
Injury Reports
Rib fracture & lung puncture
Week 12 (2019)
2
2
Hunter Renfrow College Stats
| Year Year | Games Games | Receptions Recs | Receiving Yards Rec Yds | Target Share Tgt Share | Catch Rate Catch Rate | Special Teams Yards Special Teams | Age Age | School School |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 13 (WR) | 33 (49 tgts) | 492 (14.9 ypr) | 9.3% | 67.3% | 6 | 19 | Clemson |
| 2016 | 11 (WR) | 44 (64 tgts) | 495 (11.3 ypr) | 10.2% | 68.8% | 0 | 20 | Clemson |
| 2017 | 14 (WR) | 60 (78 tgts) | 602 (10.0 ypr) | 16.6% | 76.9% | 0 | 21 | Clemson |
| 2018 | 15 (WR) | 49 (56 tgts) | 544 (11.1 ypr) | 11.0% | 87.5% | 0 | 22 | Clemson |
Who is Hunter Renfrow
Hunter Renfrow attended the combine where he had his hand size logged at 7 7/8” which is the smallest in the NFL. He had an even less impressive 70 3/4-inch wingspan, and lastly, and probably the best metric for him, a 4.59 (33rd percentile) 40-yard dash. He would be drafted by the Raiders in the fifth round. Renfrow proved himself as a productive player, flashing his 10.99 (76th percentile) Agility Score while lined up in the slot and running quick cutting routes. His first year started quietly, however he finished the last two games of the year with a top-10 weekly fantasy ranking.
In his second year, he continued to produce, and improved on his efficiency with only two drops. He also increased his air yards share as the team grew to trust him more. In 2021, the Raiders watched their star tight end Darren Waller be in and out of the lineup with injuries, and also lost Henry Ruggs, but Hunter Renfrow dominated the pass catchers as the primary weapon for the season, with 103 receptions, fourth most in the NFL. He would finish as the number ten wide receiver in fantasy football and had the 9th most slot snaps in the league. He went into 2021 with an ADP of in the 18th round, but he will surely crush that in 2022 drafts.
The Raiders apparently sensed that 'The Slot Machine' being their number one receiver was not going to be enough, so they went out and got the number one receiver of all number one receivers: Davante Adams. All of a sudden between Adams, Renfrow, and Darren Waller, Derek Carr has arguably the best cast of weapons of any quarterback in the NFL. Hunter Renfrow will continue to be featured prominently in that offense, especially one guided by Josh McDaniels, who has a history of making sure slot receivers are fed well.
