Cade Otton To Face Competition
Tampa Bay Buccaneers tight end Cade Otton earned the ...
Year Year | Games Played Games | Targets Tgts | Receptions Rec | Receiving Yards Rec Yds | Yards Per Reception YPR | Air Yards Air Yds | Receiving TDs Rec TD | Fantasy Points Per Game Fantasy Pts/Game |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022 | 16 | 65 | 42 | 391 | 9.3 | 382 | 2 | 5.8 (#27) |
Targets | Target Share | Target Rate | Snap Share | Slot Snaps | Routes Run | Route Participation Route % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
65 (4.1 p/g) | 9.5% (16.2% rz) | 15.7% | 69.4% | 147 (19.2% rate) | 413 (25.8 p/g) | 58.3% |
#17 | #31 | #37 | #22 | #15 | #7 | #26 |
Air Yards | Air Yards Share | Average Target Distance (ADOT) Target Depth (ADOT) | Deep Targets | Red Zone Targets Red Zone Tgts | Target Quality Rating | Catchable Target Rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
382 (23.9 p/g) | 7.6% | 5.9 | 4 (0.3 p/g) | 16 (6 rec) | 4.57 | 76.9% (50 tgts) |
#29 | #34 | #32 | #27 | #5 | #27 | #25 |
Receptions Recs | Receiving Yards Rec Yards | Yards After Catch YAC | Unrealized Air Yards | Total TDs | Fantasy Points Per Game Fantasy Pts/Game | Expected Fantasy Points Per Game Expected Fantasy Pts/Game |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
42 (2.6 p/g) | 391 (24.4 p/g) | 178 (2.7 p/tgt) | 169 (2.6 p/tgt) | 2 (4.8% rate) | 5.8 | 7.3 (-1.47 diff) |
#19 | #26 | #24 | #25 | #32 | #27 | #23 |
Target Accuracy | Yards Per Route Run | Formation Adjusted Yards Per Route Run Formation Adjusted YPRR | Yards Per Target YPT | Yards Per Reception YPR | Yards Per Team Pass Attempt Yards/Team Pass Attempt | True Catch Rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7.5 | 0.95 | - | 6.0 | 9.3 | 0.55 | 84.0% (64.6% actual) |
#23 | #35 | - | #33 | #29 | #34 | #23 |
Target Separation | Average Cushion | Target Premium | Dominator Rating | Juke Rate | Drops | Contested Catch Rate Contested Catch % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.29 | 1.90 | -8.4% | 8.4% | 7.1% | 2 (3.1% rate) | 33.3% (9 tgts) |
#38 | #29 | #28 | #32 | - | #27 | #24 |
Production Premium | Expected Points Added (EPA) EPA | QB Rating Per Target QB Rating Per Target | Best Ball Points Added Best Ball Pts Added | Fantasy Points Per Route Run Fantasy Points Per Route | Fantasy Points Per Target Fantasy Points Per Target | Total Fantasy Points Total Fantasy Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-12.6 | +10.7 | 91.3 | 13.1 (0.8 p/g) | 0.23 | 1.43 | 93.10 |
#35 | #35 | #22 | #30 | #35 | #33 | #26 |
Week Wk | Opponent Opp | Snap Share Snap Share | Routes Routes | Targets Targets | Receptions Receptions | Receiving Yards Receiving Yards | Fantasy Points Fantasy Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DAL | 45.2% | 2 (6.9% rate) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 (#56) |
2 | NO | 51.6% | 9 (25.7% rate) | 2 | 1 | 4 (14 air) | 1.4 (#50) |
4 | KC | 67.8% | 24 (45.3% rate) | 4 | 3 | 29 (21 air) | 5.9 (#26) |
5 | ATL | 96.1% | 48 (92.3% rate) | 7 (2 rz) | 6 | 43 (27 air) | 10.3 (#12) |
6 | PIT | 52.9% | 18 (42.9% rate) | 3 (1 rz) | 2 | 23 (33 air) | 4.3 (#29) |
7 | CAR | 80.3% | 31 (62.0% rate) | 5 | 4 | 64 (33 air) | 10.4 (#10) |
8 | BAL | 90.5% | 34 (72.3% rate) | 5 (3 rz) | 2 | 15 (42 air) | 3.5 (#33) |
9 | LAR | 83.5% | 48 (81.4% rate) | 6 (2 rz) | 5 (1 tds) | 68 (41 air) | 17.8 (#4) |
10 | SEA | 62.2% | 8 (26.7% rate) | 3 | 3 | 35 (30 air) | 6.5 (#18) |
12 | CLE | 50.0% | 16 (34.8% rate) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 (#56) |
13 | NO | 85.3% | 45 (81.8% rate) | 10 (1 rz) | 6 (1 tds) | 28 (42 air) | 14.8 (#1) |
14 | SF | 52.1% | 24 (43.6% rate) | 5 | 4 | 28 (31 air) | 6.8 (#15) |
15 | CIN | 67.1% | 26 (57.8% rate) | 1 | 1 | 20 (3 air) | 3.0 (#41) |
16 | ARI | 83.3% | 35 (72.9% rate) | 7 (3 rz) | 2 | 12 (32 air) | 3.2 (#37) |
17 | CAR | 89.3% | 40 (83.3% rate) | 6 (3 rz) | 2 | 17 (28 air) | 3.7 (#41) |
18 | ATL | 35.2% | 5 (14.7% rate) | 1 (1 rz) | 1 | 5 (5 air) | 1.5 (#51) |
19 | DAL | 74.7% | 37 (54.4% rate) | 7 (1 rz) | 4 | 58 (46 air) | 9.8 (#7) |
Value Over Stream: Valuation scheme calculates a player’s fantasy pts/game over the average waiver wire replacement in standard fantasy league formats during either the current season (or previous year during the offseason) and adjusts for positional bust rates. VOS rank in parenthesis spans all positions, enabling player comparisons across QB's, RB's, WR's, and TE's.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers tight end Cade Otton earned the ...
Tampa Bay Buccaneers tight end Cade Otton caught four of ...
Tampa Bay Buccaneers tight end Cade Otton caught two of six...
Player Popularity Index (PPI) ranks PlayerProfiler page views over the last 30 days. For example, the No. 1 PPI player page is the most frequently visited page in recent weeks.
Year Year | Games Games | Receptions Recs | Receiving Yards Rec Yds | Target Share Tgt Share | Catch Rate Catch Rate | Receiving Touchdowns Rec TDs | Special Teams Yards Special Teams | Age Age | School School |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 8 (TE) | 13 (17 tgts) | 174 (13.4 ypr) | 4.2% | 76.5% | 3 | - | 19 | Washington |
2019 | 11 (TE) | 32 (43 tgts) | 344 (10.8 ypr) | 10.5% | 74.4% | 2 | - | 20 | Washington |
2020 | 4 (TE) | 18 (20 tgts) | 258 (14.3 ypr) | 18.0% | 90.0% | 3 | - | 21 | Washington |
2021 | 8 (TE) | 28 (43 tgts) | 250 (8.9 ypr) | 10.5% | 65.1% | 1 | 0 | 22 | Washington |
He redshirted his freshman year, making 2018 his first year as a collegiate producer. The Husky offense focused on feeding Myles Gaskin and Salvon Ahmed the rock in 2018. Even so, Cade Otton earned his way onto the field and finished the year with 13 receptions for 174 yards and 3 touchdowns.
The following season showcased Otton’s consistency as a pass catcher. He hauled in 32 receptions for 344 yards and had 3 or more receptions in 8 of the 11 games he played. Otton maintained a high catch rate of 74.40% per PlayerProfiler stats.
2020 was his breakout season but will look weird on paper due to the PAC-12’s late start. In the 4 games the Huskies played, Otton led the team in receptions (18), yards (258), and receiving touchdowns (3). There wasn’t a single other player on the team with 10 or more receptions. However, his final season was marred with injuries and Covid related issues. He missed 4 games, but still finished the season with a 10.50% target share.
Cade Otton was selected in the 4th round of the 2022 NFL Draft by the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Otton’s workout metrics are a black box. He lands in a spot where he could have the starting role as Brate gets older. For now, he’ll be second on the depth chart and probably won’t have much value. When Brady leaves, it’s also going to be risky to try and trust him as a starting asset because we won’t know who replaces Brady.